Pennsylvania Rubber Co. v. Detroit Shipbuilding Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Shepard, J., presiding. Assumpsit by the Pennsylvania Rubber Company against the Detroit Shipbuilding Company for a balance due for work, labor and materials. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This litigation grows out of the fact that in the fall of 1909 the parties made two contracts for the furnishing and, installation by the plaintiff of so-called rubber tiling upon two steamers then under construction by the defendant. Except that one contract was for steamer known as No. 180, afterwards named the Rochester, and the other for steamer known as No. 181, afterwards named the Octorara, they were identical. The dispute involves substan*307tially the same questions as to both steamers. A suit was brought by plaintiff upon each contract, for failure to pay the agreed price., The pleas…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hanley v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Fred W. Wolf Co. v. Monarch Refrigerating Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1911
- Brady v. . CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- J. Thompson Manufacturing Co. v. GundersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Kingman & Co. v. WatsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Otto Misch Co. v. E. E. Davis Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Burge Ice MacHine Company, an Illinois Corporation v. George J. Weiss, George J. Weiss v. Burge Ice MacHine Company, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- Rubin v. Crowley, Milner & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921