Legal Opinion

Zicca v. City of Hampton

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 9, 1990No. Record 900298PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hassell

In this appeal, we consider whether the City of Hampton complied with the decision of a grievance panel which decided that a City employee should be reinstated to his former position.

Roy V. Zicca was employed as a golf course superintendent for the City of Hampton. The duties of a golf course superintendent, as described in the City’s job description, are:

Plans and directs the maintenance and operation of a 100 acre golf course. Directs the operation and maintenance of various types of golf course maintenance equipment. Maintains the cemetery and other public property in the immediate area.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Angle v. OvertonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Norfolk Community Services BoardSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  2. Harris v. CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VA.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
  3. Harris v. City of Virginia BeachCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  4. Virginia Department of Taxation v. DaughtrySupreme Court of Virginia · 1995
  5. Virginia Department of Taxation v. DaughtryCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API