Legal Opinion

Henson v. Hays

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 9, 1928No. 19641PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Tfi’e defendant in error, as plaintiff, began this action in tfie. common pleas court of Tulsa county, for tfie recovery of money and instituted garnishment proceedings in said action. Tfie plaintiff in error, defendant below, moved to dissolve tfie garnishment proceedings, and on July 7, 1928, tfie trial court made an order dissolving tfie same, but on tfie same day set aside said order. Thereafter a hearing was had on tfie motion to dissolve, and at tfie conclusion tfier’eof the motion was overruled and the dissolution of tfie garnishment proceedings denied. Plaintiff in error has appealed,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City Land & Development Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Tulsa Hospital Ass'n v. JubySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Berry-Beall Dry Goods Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. HancockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Garretson v. MeekerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Saunders v. FirestoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API