Legal Opinion

Saunders v. Firestone

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 25, 1936No. 26623PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal comes to this court by petition in errpr, with case-m.ade attached, from the district court of Stephens county, Okla., from an order denying a motion to dissolve an attachment.

Defendant in error, J. L, Eirestone, plaintiff below, commenced an action in the district court of Stephens county against the plaintiffs in error, W. G. Saunders, doing business under the name of Tri-State Supply Company, and Ed Saunders, as defendants, seeking judgment in the sum of $4,454.40, based on a- contract, of • employment. Upbn an attachment' affidavit, certafin warehouses containing merchandise…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lillard v. MeisbergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Oklahoma City Land & Development Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Brooks v. J. R. Watkins Medical Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. In Re Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Alexander Drug Co. v. HolbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Long v. McMahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Auto Convoy Company v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Auto Convoy Company v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API