Legal Opinion
Randolph v. Lipscher
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 25, 1986No. Civ. 86-562 (AET)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMPSON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Norma Randolph and Nancy Menke 1 bring this action to challenge the constitutionality of Rule 1:17-1 of the Rules Governing the Court of the State of New Jersey [“Rule”] the relevant parts of which are as follows:
The following persons in or serving the judicial branch of government shall not hold any elective office nor be a candidate therefor, nor engage in political activity, nor, without prior written approval of the Supreme Court, requested through the Administrative Director of the Courts, hold any other public office, position or employment:
a)…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Worldwide Church of God v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Centifanti v. NixCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Centifanti v. NixCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Levine v. Supreme Court of WisconsinDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1988
- Feliciano v. Tribunal Supremo De Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.