Legal Opinion

Alexander Drug Co. v. Holbert

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 12, 1932No. 22101PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff in error, as plaintiff below, filed suit in the court of common pleas of Tulsa county against the defendants in error on open account for $606.-20, and, at the time of filing petition an affidavit and undertaking for attachment was also filed by plaintiff and writ of attachment issued. Hearing was had upon the motion to dissolve and vacate said attachment, and, on August 18, 1930, the court entered its order and judgment sustaining the motion and dissolving and vacating the attachment, plaintiff gave notice of its intention to appeal, and at the same time the trial court entered an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Reynolds v. PhippsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. First Nat. Bank of Ft. Smith, Ark. v. ChowningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Jones v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Ridell v. YoderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bomford v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  2. East Side Baptist Church v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Meek v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  4. Saunders v. FirestoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Ketchum v. ReidySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API