Legal Opinion
Connecticut Alcohol & Drug Abuse Commission v. Freedom of Information Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 9, 1995No. 15133PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether, under the circumstances of this case, an investigative file of a sexual harassment complaint by one employee of a state agency against a coworker constitutes a “personnel or . . . similar” file within the meaning of General Statutes § 1-19 (b) (2)1 of the Free*30dom of Information Act (act). The plaintiffs, the Connecticut alcohol and drug abuse commission (CADAC) and Patricia C. Lempicki, CAD AC’s personnel administrator,2 appeal3 from the judgment of the trial court dismissing its administrative appeal from an order by the defendant freedom of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States Department of State v. Washington Post Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Gateway Co. v. DiNoiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Wilson v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- City of New Haven v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hunnihan v. Mattatuck Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Burinskas v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Cannata v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Rocque v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Manns v. City of Charleston Police DepartmentWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.