Legal Opinion

Foster v. Sitel Operating Corporation

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided January 10, 2023No. 3:19-cv-00148Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION MARQUISE FOSTER, et al. ) ) Plaintiffs, ) NO. 3:19-cv-00148 ) v. ) JUDGE RICHARDSON ) SITEL OPERATING CORPORATION, ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This case was originally filed (in the southern District of Texas, before being transferred to this Court) as a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act,

29 U.S.C. § 201

et seq., against Defendant for unpaid wages, including unpaid overtime. Then, in an Order entered on April 29, 2022, (Doc. 412, “Order”), the assigned Magistrate…

2Cases cited10 opinions

United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
Experimental Holdings, Inc. v. FarrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
De Asencio v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.