Legal Opinion

City of Bryan v. Knapp

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1986No. 85-285PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

Crim. R. 12(E) provides: “A motion made before trial other than a motion for change of venue, shall be timely determined before trial. Where factual issues are involved in determining a motion, the court shall state its essential findings on the record.” (Emphasis added.) In ruling on Knapp’s motion for discharge, the trial court on request by the *65defendant was required to determine factual issues concerning the reasons for delay of the trial. Crim. R. 12(E) mandates that the court state its essential findings on the record.1 Without such findings, neither the court of appeals nor this court…

2Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. WaddyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. RicheyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. EleyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. BennerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API