Legal Opinion
Kurtenbach v. Securus Technologies
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided March 25, 2022No. 1:21-cv-01006Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA (alba □□□ NORTHERN DIVISION MATTHEW C. KURTENBACH, 1:21-CV-01006-CBK Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OPINION VS. AND SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, ORDER Defendant. Plaintiff claims that, while he was a pre-trial detainee facing state court criminal proceedings in South Dakota and Minnesota, defendant Securus Technologies, the telecommunications provider for the jails where he was detained, violated the Electronic Communication Privacy Act (the “Wiretap Act”), 18 U.S.C. 2510-2520, by intercepting, monitoring, or recording at least one call to his attorney.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.