Legal Opinion
Herrmann v. Brown
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided July 10, 1995No. 95-97PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IVERS, Judge, filed the opinion of the Court.
KRAMER, Judge, filed a concurring opinion.
IVERS, Judge:
Gary L. Herrmann, through counsel, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board), in its January 4, 1995, decision, exceeded its jurisdiction and violated the terms of an order granting a joint motion for remand when it remanded the petitioner’s claim for entitlement to an increased rating for a low back disability (currently rated as 10% disabling) to a VA Regional Office (RO) for further development and readjudication. The petitioner…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Colvin v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Fee Agreement of CoxUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
- Snyder v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2000
- Chandler v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
- Mark W. Breeden v. Anthony J. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2004
- Mark W. Breeden v. Anthony J. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2004