Legal Opinion

Baker v. Hanson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1924No. 5,564PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

In 1918, Herschel Hanson was appointed administrator of the estate of George Van Parker, deceased, and duly qualified by taking the statutory oath and giving bond in the sum of $2,000, with John O. Seidel and Chris Christensen as sureties. In January, 1919, the court ordered the administrator to sell the real property belonging to the estate, but required an additional bond in the sum of $2,000, which was furnished, with the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company as surety. From the sale Hanson realized $1,700, and soon thereafter left the state without accounting for the proceeds. In…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ex parte CaseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Irwin v. BackusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Chaquette v. OrtetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Smith v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Steinberger v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Estate of SullivanArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Swanberg v. National Surety Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Midland Empire Packing Co. v. Yale Oil Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Oliveri v. MaroncelliMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Mitchell v. Columbia Casualty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API