Legal Opinion

Fondelier v. Riddle

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1943No. Appeal, 206PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

'The plaintiff, Harry Fondelier, brought an action in assumpsit to recover the sum of $1816 with interest from January 18, 1941, for personal services rendered to his uncle, Christ Keene, deceased, from September 15, 1937, until his uncle’s death January 18, 1941, a total of 174 weeks. The claim was based on an alleged oral contract whereby the deceased agreed to pay the plaintiff the sum of $10 a week, together with certain sums of money he advanced to his uncle from time to time.

There was insufficient proof to permit a recovery for the money loaned. That question was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gilbraith's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Gibb's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Cummiskey's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Bemis Et Ux. v. Van Pelt, Exr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. In Re: Estate of M.W. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Snively EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Northampton County Area Community College v. Dow Chemical, U.S.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Northampton County Area Community College v. Dow Chemical, U.S.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API