Legal Opinion · Dissent

Northampton County Area Community College v. Dow Chemical, U.S.A.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 7, 1991No. Appeal 142 Eastern District Appeal Docket 1990Published

1DissentPapadakos, Justice

Because I believe this Court should have addressed the question of who can invoke the doctrine of nullum tempus occurrit regi (time does not run against the king), I feel compelled to dissent to the per curiam order disposing of this appeal.

On or about August 31, 1971, the Appellants, Northampton Area Community College1 and the Northampton Area Community College Authority,2 engaged James T. Hartnett Construction Company, Inc. (Hartnett), Appellee, to construct The Engineering and Business Technologies Center (the EBTC). Hartnett subcontracted with Appellee, Clarence B. Haney Mason Contractor,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. United States v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Tranter v. Alleghency County Co. AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Insurance Co. of North America v. CarnahanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API