Legal Opinion

Tudryck v. Mutch

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1948No. Calendar No. 43,578PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, C. J.

Leave to appeal, in tbe nature of mandamus, was granted to review orders of the circuit court of Arenac county, entered April 17, 1946, denying tbe motions of plaintiffs Tony Tudryck and Mary Tudryck, bis wife, and defendants Andrew Smyl and Victoria Smyl, bis wife, to set aside a certain decree and granting tbe motions of defendant Joseph Martin, receiver of Sterling Bank of Sleeper and Chamberlain, to dismiss tbe Tudryck and Smyl motions.

A record of 270 pages is presented, to which is added a separate volume of 264 pages of exhibits, and tbe respective parties have filed 10 separate briefs.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of MeredithMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Long v. EarleMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. August v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Daly v. HosmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Russell v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bush v. ShabahangMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Boodt v. Borgess Medical CenterMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Mungin v. Florida East Coast Railway CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1970
  4. Newton v. Security National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Coates v. DrakeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API