Daly v. Hosmer
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus. Eelator applied for mandamus to compel the respondent to set aside a' decree for divorce. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The relator filed a bill for divorce on September 9, 1893. The defendant filed an answer in the nature of a cross-bill on December 26, 1893, said answer being verified; but said verification did not contain the averment negativing collusion, as required by 3 How. Stat. § 6232. On January 17, 1894, complainant filed an answer *394to the answer in the nature of a cross-bill. Proofs were’ taken in open court, beginning on March 14, 1894, and ending March 21, 1894. Both parties appeared by counsel, and both introduced testimony. TJpon the 21st day of March a decree was made, granting a divorce to the…
2Cited by10 opinions
- People of Michigan v. Selesa Arrosieur LikineMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- State ex rel. Burr v. Tavarse & Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
- Clutton v. CluttonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Tudryck v. MutchMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Abbott v. Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.