Legal Opinion

Veselik v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 17, 2001No. 98-06424; A109168PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Petitioner, the wife of deceased claimant Barry Veselik, seeks judicial review of a determination of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) that reversed claimant’s award for permanent total disability (PTD) benefits. Petitioner argues that ORS 656.283(7) is unconstitutional on its face and that the Supreme Court’s decision in Koskela v. Willamette Industries, Inc., 331 Or 362, 15 P3d 548 (2000), compels reversal of the Board’s decision. Because the record demonstrates that petitioner does not make the same argument to us on review that she made to the Board, we affirm.

Claimant was a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Koskela v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Marvin Wood Products v. CallowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Koskela v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Baggett v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Miller v. CC Meisel Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Thomas Creek Lumber & Log Co. v. Board of ForestryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. VanSpeybroeck v. Tillamook CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. Goin v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. Wahlgren v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API