Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Streich v. Hilton-Davis, Div. of Sterling Drug

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1984No. 83-457PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

Hilton-Davis appeals from a judgment entered in the District Court for the Eleventh Judicial District, Flathead County after a jury awarded Streich, Boorman, and Williamson a total of $781,119 in damages. Hilton-Davis, as manufacturer of a chemical product called Fusarex, was found liable for damages based on theories of strict liability in tort, negligence, and breach of warranties. We affirm the judgment and damage award.

Fusarex is manufactured and sold by Hilton-Davis as a potato sprout suppressant. The directions for use of Fusarex require dusting seed potatoes just before storage. The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Brandenburger v. Toyota Motor Sales, U. S. A., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Brown v. North American Manufacturing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Shields v. Morton Chemical CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. King v. Hilton-DavisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  3. Krueger v. General Motors Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Emery v. Federated Foods, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In re Grand Theft Auto Video Game Consumer LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API