Legal Opinion

O'Donnell v. City of Butte

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1911No. 3,020PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; J. M. Clements, Judge of the First Judicial District, Presiding. Action by Mary O’Donnell and others against the City of Bntte. From a judgment for plaintiffs, and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

This action was brought by Mary O’Donnell and certain’ minors, by Mary O’Donnell, their guardian, to recover damages-*98for injuries to real estate, caused by a change of grade in the street upon which the plaintiffs’ property abuts. The answer admits the corporate existence of the city, the plaintiffs’ ownership of the land, and “denies generally each and every allegation contained in plaintiffs’ complaint not herein specifically admitted or denied.” This was followed by an affirmative defense. Upon the trial plaintiffs failed to introduce any evidence of the appointment of Mary O’Donnell as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Cheatham v. RiddleTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Ewen v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Johnson v. Butte & Superior Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Rogers v. MarshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Chealey v. PurdyMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Downs v. NihillMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Mitchell v. Garfield CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Day v. KellyMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Daniel v. MoncureMontana Supreme Court · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API