Legal Opinion
Kroger Co. v. Cook
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1970No. 69-64PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAbebe, J.
The initial question presented is the power of the General Assembly to regulate the traffic in intoxicating liquor, and, specifically, the power of the Liquor Control Commission to regulate permit premises to the extent of forbidding the operation of a game of chance or contrivance on permit premises.
Statutory authority for the making of rules and regulations by the commission is supplied by R. C. 4301.03. Subsection (B) of that section provides that such rules and regulations may include:
“Rules, regulations, and orders providing in detail for the conduct of any retail business authorized…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Zugravu v. O'BrienOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- Neil House Hotel Co. v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Solomon v. Liquor Control CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- Coady v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 1937
- Stillmaker v. Dept. of Liquor ControlOhio Supreme Court · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mills-Jennings of Ohio, Inc. v. Department of Liquor ControlOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- BPOE Lodge 0170 Gallipolis v. Liquor Control CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Ohio Roundtable v. Taft, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division2002
- Midwestern Enterprises, Inc. v. StenehjemNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Progress Vending, Inc. v. Department of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.