Ohio Roundtable v. Taft
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division
1Opinion of the Court
Daniel T. Hogan, Judge.
{¶ 1} A trial was held in this matter after which the transcript was prepared. The parties then submitted post-trial briefs in accordance with an agreed-upon schedule with some reasonable extensions allowed. After reviewing the evidence presented at trial and the parties’ post-trial briefs, the court issues the following decision on the merits of the case.
{¶ 2} In this case, plaintiffs challenge the legitimacy of Ohio’s participation in the new multi-state lottery game popularly known as Mega Millions. Plaintiffs *54have asserted twelve claims in this case and defendants…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Secretary of State of Md. v. Joseph H. Munson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. FranklinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Secretary of State v. STATE LEGISLATURENevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Stockmeier v. Nevada Department of Corrections Psychological Review PanelNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Bowling v. DeWineOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Hormel Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.