Legal Opinion
Fusco v. Rocky Mountain I Investments Limited Partnership
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided April 4, 1997No. 96-P-287PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGillerman, J.
After the plaintiffs, a general partnership of independent public accountants (Seidman), were not paid in full for services rendered to thirty-four limited partnerships, they brought suit in January, 1994, against twenty-two of the limited partnerships (the defendants) claiming breach of contract (count I) and unjust enrichment, or quantum me-ruit (count II).3 Unpaid charges totaled $174,196 as of the date of suit.
At the time the services were rendered, the general partner of each of the limited partnerships was The March Company, Inc. (March Company), a Massachusetts corporation.4 On August…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bagley v. MoxleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Roberts-Haverhill v. City Coun. of HaverhillMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
- Gorovitz v. Planning Board of NantucketMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Rose v. ReganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Partnership Equities, Inc. v. MartenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fronk v. FowlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Charlette v. Charlette Bros. Foundry, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- JER SKW Services, Inc. v. GoldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Largo Realty, Inc. v. PurcellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Verizon Yellow Pages Co. v. Sims & Sims, PCMassachusetts Superior Court · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.