Legal Opinion
In re Palmentiere
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 25, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a probate proceeding, the objectants Frances Schmid and Dominick Palmentiere appeal from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County (Laurino, S.), dated July 5, 1989, which, upon granting the petitioner’s motion for judgment as a matter of law, which was made at the close of evidence at the trial, admitted the will of Pietro Palmentiere dated May 8, 1985, to probate.
Ordered that the decree is affirmed, with costs payable by the objectants personally.
*872We find no merit in the appellants’ contention that the denial of a requested adjournment was improper. The decision to grant an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. CableNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- In Re the Estate of KumstarNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- In re the Estate of HedgesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Cameron v. KnappNew York Supreme Court · 1987
- Daniels v. CumminsNew York Supreme Court · 1971
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Estate of BiancoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Terio v. TerioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re Estate of LovickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994