Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Cummins

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1971PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph F. Hawkins, J.

The two actions herein have been consolidated and were so tried. In the first action, the three plaintiffs are the surviving sisters and sole distributees of the decedent, and the latter is brought by the plaintiff, Hilda Daniels, as administratrix of the estate of Naomi Ham, deceased. Both said actions seek to set aside a deed from the decedent to the defendant and to cancel all subsequent liens and encumbrances imposed upon the real property, the plaintiffs alleging that the said deed was obtained by the defendant by his exercising undue influence and, also, that the decedent lacked the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. SeveranceNew York Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Cameron v. KnappNew York Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In re PalmentiereAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API