Legal Opinion

Looney v. Oregon Short Line Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 22, 1915No. Gen. No. 30,278; Gen. No. 20,279PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William N. Gemhill, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1914.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch

delivered" the opinion of the court.

These two cases were tried together in the Municipal Court, and have been consolidated for hearing in this court. A verdict and judgment were rendered in the Municipal Court in each case against the appellant Railroad Company for damages resulting from the negligent transportation of sheep from Weiser, Idaho, to Chicago.

The two shipments were carried in the same train. The shipment of appellee Looney consisted of 3,849 “lambs,” and the Seawell shipment consisted of 2,588 sheep, of which 143 were yearling wethers, and the remainder…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Gamble-Robinson Commission Co. v. Union Pacific RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hudson v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1915
  2. Newman v. Union Pacific RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API