Legal Opinion

Lang v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 11, 1913No. 1182PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 31921 (T. D. 33338).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

The question here presented is whether certain wood flour, so called, is dutiable, as assessed and as held by the Board of General Appraisers, at 35 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 215 of the act of 1909 as manufactures of wood, or whether it is dutiable at 20 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 480 as a nonenumerated article, or directly or by similitude at 20 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 203 as wood, unmanufactured, not specially provided for.

The board found that the wood flour was produced by pulverizing or grinding up wood and thereafter screening it to different degrees of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. FranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Murphy v. ArnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. United States v. DudleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Bartley Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. Rossman v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whelan v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  2. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  3. Caracul Fur Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API