Legal Opinion

Whelan v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 17, 1958No. C. D. 1982PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

The question for determination in this action is the proper dutiable classification, within the framework of existing tariff provisions, of certain so-called “Standard Hardboard, Industrial Grade,” hereinafter referred to as hardboard. This merchandise was imported from Canada in sheets, 4 feet in width, 8 feet in length, and of a thickness of either }&, fíe, or }( inch, with the ^-inch thickness predominating.

The collector of customs at the port of entry classified the importations as pulpboard, plate finished, and assessed duty thereon, at the rate of 7% per centum ad valorem,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. Bakelite Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Markell v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  4. Whelan v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  5. Lang v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Borneo Sumatra Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Superwood Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  3. John H. Faunce, Inc. Masonite v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
  4. John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  5. Mohns Commercial Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API