Legal Opinion

Dougherty v. Reckler

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 20, 1921PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Jasper District Court. — D. W. Hamilton, Judge. Action for damages alleged to have resulted from the acts of a vicious dog owned or harbored by the defendant. The material facts are referred to in the opinion. There was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. —

1Opinion of the CourtArthur, J.

i animals- Ka-biiity for injury: in peril. This is an action in tort, to recover damages on account of injuries received by plaintiff while attempting to intercept and control a team of horses owned by him, which, while being driven upon the public highway w "VVillis Kono, a boy about 14 years of age, employed by plaintiff, became frightened by a dog which ran into the highway and snapped at or bit one of the horses. The team was hitched to a riding cultivator, and was proceeding along the highway three or four rods in the rear of a team of mules, hitched to a surface plow, which was being…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Liming v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  2. Saylor v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Sanders v. O'CallaghanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  4. Cameron v. BryanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  5. Beckler v. MerringerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. J. A. T. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. Luick v. SondrolSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. Connolly v. ConlanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  4. Connolly v. ConlanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  5. J. A. T. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API