Legal Opinion

Sanders v. O'Callaghan

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 22, 1900PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Polls District Court. — Hon. O. P. Hoimes, Judge. Action to recover damages for injuries resulting from tbe bite of a dog. There was a trial to a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Deemer, J.-

1 -Appellant has filed a motion to strike appellee’s amended abstract, because not filed within the time required by our rules. That it was not filed within ten day’s after the receipt of appellant’s abstract, as required by rule No. 22, is conceded; but, as appellant - did not file his abstract within the time required, and as no prejudice has resulted from the filing of the additional abstract, the motion to strike will be overruled. Clark v. Ellsworth, 104 Iowa, 442; Foley v. Association, 102 Iowa, 272; Galer v. Galer, 108 Iowa, 496.

*5772 3 4 5 6 7 *576II. While driving along one of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Morris v. C., B. & Q. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. Kendall v. City of AlbiaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  3. Ford v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  4. Fry v. Dubuque & Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  5. Bailey v. City of CentervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wilson v. FlemingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Elzig v. BalesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. Cushman v. Carbondale Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  4. Woodworth v. Iowa Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  5. Alexander v. CrosbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API