Legal Opinion

Luick v. Sondrol

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 20, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

Plaintiff’s testimony, in substance, is that, while he was riding an unshod horse along a paved street, defendant’s dog barked at and frightened the horse; that the horse jumped, and fell on the plaintiff, breaking the plaintiff’s leg. There was evidence that the pavement was wet and slippery, and that the horse’s feet slipped, and there was evidence tending to show that the dog frequently ran out, and chased and barked at passing horses. At the close of the evidence, the plaintiff withdrew all claims of common-law liability and rested his case upon Section 2340, Code Supplement, 1913.

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marshall v. BlackshireSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. Alexander v. CrosbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. Sanders v. O'CallaghanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  4. Brown v. MoyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  5. Stuber ex rel. Stuber v. GannonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Netusil v. NovakNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Collins v. KenealySupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  3. Tidal Oil Co. v. ForcumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API