Legal Opinion

Matter of Petition of Kelly

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 4, 1914No. Civ. No. 1279PublishedCited by 25 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This proceeding, as its title readily indicates, was instituted by the above-named petitioners, in the superior court of Tuolumne County, for the purpose of securing the judgment of said court that one Mary Louise Donahoo, a minor, is an abandoned child within the purview of section 224 of the Civil Code, the ultimate object of the judicial declaration so sought herein being to enable said petitioners to adopt said minor.

The petition alleges facts sufficient to state a case of abandonment under the section of the Civil Code above mentioned and the same was answered and contested by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of CozzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Nugent v. PowellWyoming Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Dikes v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Middle Creek Ditch Co. v. HenryMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Breedlove v. StumpTennessee Supreme Court · 1832

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
  2. In RE ADOPTION OF BRYANT v. KurtzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Adoption of Strauser Ex Rel. Lucas v. StrauserWyoming Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Application of AltmillerIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Nevelos v. RailstonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API