Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Santiago

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 28, 2009No. 446 EDA 2008PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

SHOGAN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Arnaldo Torres Santiago, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered following his convictions of first degree murder, possessing an instrument of crime (“PIC”), and two counts of violating the Uniform Firearms Act (“VUFA”). 1 Appellant challenges, inter alia, the admission of the murder weapon and a witness statement obtained as a result of Appellant’s suppressed confession to police. We affirm.

¶ 2 The trial court aptly summarized the facts of this case as follows:

During the early morning hours of April 23, 2006, John Reed was at the home of Omar…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Commonwealth v. WidmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. United States v. PataneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Commonwealth v. LaCavaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. BoczkowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. ClineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Com. v. Gilliam, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Saranchak v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. Koller Concrete, Inc. v. Tube City IMS, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API