Legal Opinion

Commonwealth ex rel. Pilla v. Pilla

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1959No. Appeal, No. 67PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

This is an appeal from an order of the Municipal Court of Philadelphia denying the support petition of Nora Pilla, the appellant, on the ground that a valid common law marriage never existed between her and her alleged husband, Carl Pilla, the appellee.

Nora Pilla testified that she and the appellee were married on October 1, 1952 by common law in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The record discloses that a meretricious relationship between the parties began in 1949 or 1950, at which time the appellee was a married man with three children. The wife of the appellee divorced him…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Wagner v. WagnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Caddy v. Johnstown Firemen's Relief Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. McLaughlin's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Rager v. Johnstown Traction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Steadman v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Bell v. FerraroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Drebot v. DrebotSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Commonwealth v. Ferguson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1990
  5. Johns v. Johns, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API