Steadman v. Turner
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, Judge:
This appeal, in an action for divorce, is taken from the decree of the court that a valid marriage did not exist between the parties. Appellant contends that a valid common law marriage existed between the parties thereby entitling her to equitable distribution of marital assets under the Pennsylvania Divorce Code 1 (“Divorce Code”) in an action for divorce or, in the alternative, under the principles of annulment of marriage. We agree with the court below that a marriage did not exist and that appellant is not entitled to the relief requested.
The scope of review to be applied…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Wagner EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Buradus v. General Cement Products Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- In Re Estate of GargesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Canute v. CanuteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Collier v. City of MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Commonwealth v. 6066 Buckingham Drive, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1989
- In re Estate of CoraceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Johns v. Johns, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1992