Caddy v. Johnstown Firemen's Relief Ass'n
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, P. J.,
The issue of fact for the jury in this case was whether there had been a valid common-law marriage between the plaintiff, Bertha Caddy, and James H. Caddy, who was a member of the defendant beneficial association. If there was, plaintiff, as his widow, is entitled to an affirmance of her judgment against the defendant.
We had occasion in Murdock’s Est., 92 Pa. Superior Ct. 275, to consider at some length the subject of common-law marriages in this State, and it is not necessary to repeat what we there said. In Pennsylvania, marriage is a civil contract and does not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stevenson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Estate of MurdockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Craig's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- McGrath's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Bisbing's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Wagner EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Commonwealth ex rel. McDermott v. McDermottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- David v. BELLEVUE LOCUST GARAGECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Rosenberger EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Fiedler v. National Tube Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.