Legal Opinion

Smith v. Gill

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1872PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Cherokee District Court. Smith and another sued Gill and wife to recover for the value of certain lumber and other materials used in the construction of a dwelling-house built for defendants in the city of Baxter Springs, and foreclose a lien on said dwelling-house for the sum so claimed. The court below gave judgment at the February Term 1872 in favor of defendants, and plaintiffs bring the case here.

Read the full summary

Error from Cherokee District Court. Smith and another sued Gill and wife to recover for the value of certain lumber and other materials used in the construction of a dwelling-house built for defendants in the city of Baxter Springs, and foreclose a lien on said dwelling-house for the sum so claimed. The court below gave judgment at the February Term 1872 in favor of defendants, and plaintiffs bring the case here. The error assigned is, that the judgment is contrary to the evidence.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

The only error alleged in this case is, that upon the evidence, the judgment should have been rendered for the plaintiffs in error. But as the bill of exceptions fails to show that it contains all the evidence offered on the trial, it is impossible for us to say that the judgment was against the weight of evidence, or rendered in favor of the wrong *75party. This matter is well settled in this court: Western Mass. Ins. Co. v. Duffy, 2 Kas., 347; Cooper v. Armstrong, 4 Kas., 30; McGrew v. Armstrong, 5 Kas., 284; Topeka v. Tuttle, 5 Kas., 323;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Western Massachusetts Insurance v. DuffeySupreme Court of Kansas · 1864
  2. City of Topeka v. TuttleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  3. Cooper v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Kansas · 1865
  4. Hale v. Republican River Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  5. McGrew v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carnahan v. GustineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
  2. Berry Bros. v. Hill, Fontaine & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API