Carnahan v. Gustine
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error From the District Court of 0 County. E. M. Carnahan instituted attachment proceedings in the district court of 0 county, on the 18th day of January, A. D., 1894, against A. Gustine, A. Gustine & Co. and E. Gustine. Defendants filed a motion to dissolve the attachment.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Scott, J.:
This is an action for the recovery of damages in the sum of five thousand dollars ($5,000), as the result of a malicious prosecution. The petition was filed in the district court of O county, on the 18th day of January, 1894. On the same date the attachment affidavit was filed which reads as follows:
“E. M. Carnahan, being duly sworn, says: That he is the plaintiff in the above entitled action; that said plaintiff is about to commence the above entitled action, in the said court, against the said defendants for the recovery of five thousand…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Western Massachusetts Insurance v. DuffeySupreme Court of Kansas · 1864
- Bundrem v. DennSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- McIntosh v. Comm'rs of Crawford CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- Cooper v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Kansas · 1865
- Hale v. Republican River Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1871
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Newell v. WhitwellMontana Supreme Court · 1895
- Shelby v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Sonnesyn v. AkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Millus v. Lowrey Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- McComb v. WattSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913