McGrew v. Armstrong
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Wyandotte County. This was an action brought by plaintiff in error in the court below against the defendant, a constable of Wyandotte county, to recover the value of goods belonging to Leigh & Beaumont,-levied on by said constable..
Read the full summary
Error from Wyandotte County. This was an action brought by plaintiff in error in the court below against the defendant, a constable of Wyandotte county, to recover the value of goods belonging to Leigh & Beaumont,-levied on by said constable.. The answer consisted of a general denial and a second court alleging the official capacity of the defendant, and that he levied upon the goods in question by virtue of an execution in favor of Broadwell, Hatch & Co. v. Frederick Beaumont, issued from the district court of Wyandotte county. The defendant on the trial, under exception of plaintiff,…
1Opinion of the Court
*286 By the Court,
Safford, J.
Two grounds of error are insisted upon in this case which requires notice; and First, That the finding and judgment of the court below were not sustained by and are contrary to the evidence in the case.
It will be observed that the case made, although it sets forth a large amount of the testimony which was produced upon the trial, which was by the court without the intervention of a jury, does not purport to contain the whole of it.
sufficient Eec. Such being the fact, it will be only necessary †0 remark relative to the point stated, that this court will not, as indeed…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Mulhall v. MulhallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Manning v. MaytubbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Carnahan v. GustineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
- Smith v. GillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Berry Bros. v. Hill, Fontaine & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894