Legal Opinion

Post Express Printing Co. v. Adams

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from special term, Monroe county. This was an action brought by the Post Express Printing Company against James Adams and others to recover damages for an alleged boycott of the-plaintiff’s business. Motion by defendants for bill of particulars denied. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtDwight, J.

The action is for damages resulting from an alleged “boycott” of the plaintiff’s business. The complaint charges that the defendants and several other persons, acting together, and calling themselves the “Central Labor Union,” did agree to place the plaintiff under a boycott, and, in pursuance of such agreement, did circulate, and cause to be circulated, among the inhabitants of the city of Boehester, a great number of printed circulars, of which a copy is set out in the complaint, which, among other things, cautioned or advised the-friends of street-car drivers not to buy the Post Express;…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cunard v. . FrancklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burns v. HayesNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Dietz v. LeberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. Husted v. A. P. Husted Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  4. Jutsum v. Bricklayers', Plasterers' & Stonemasons' UnionNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Dietz v. LeberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API