Dietz v. Leber
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Edward F. Leber and another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 22,d' day of September, 1898,. denying the defendants’ motion, ■ to require the plaintiff to furnish a bill of particulars.
1Opinion of the Court
Woodward, J.:
This action was brought for the purpose of recovering damages for an alleged malicious prosecution. The complaint alleges, among other things, “ That the facts of this plaintiff being so prosecuted and arrested, and of his being, charged by the defendants and through, their procurement with having been guilty of fraud, false and fraudulent representations were extensively published in public newspapers through the procurement of defendants, as plaintiff believes, and with malicious intent to injure plaintiff’s good name and fame in the community and among plaintiff’s customers,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Roberts v. Safety Buggy Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Post Express Printing Co. v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Jutsum v. Bricklayers', Plasterers' & Stonemasons' UnionNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Macdonough v. HaymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. Bradstreet Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Bell v. HeathertonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Platt v. BonsallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Platt v. BonsallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908