Legal Opinion

Dietz v. Leber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 18, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from special term. Action by Charles Henry Dietz against Edward F. Leber and another. From an order denying defendants’ motion for a bill of particulars, they appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWoodward, J.

This action was brought for the purpose of recovering damages for an alleged malicious prosecution. The complaint alleges, among other things:

“That the facts of this plaintiff being so prosecuted and arrested, and of his being charged by the defendants, and through their procurement, with having been guilty of fraud, false and fraudulent representations, were extensively published in public newspapers through the procurement of defendants, as plaintiff believes, and with malicious intent to injure plaintiff's good name and fame in the community and among plaintiff’s customers, clients, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Safety Buggy Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  2. Post Express Printing Co. v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Jutsum v. Bricklayers', Plasterers' & Stonemasons' UnionNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Macdonough v. HaymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  5. Roberts v. Safety Buggy Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dietz v. LeberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. Platt v. BonsallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API