Legal Opinion

Fayerweather v. Tucker

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action by Daniel B. Eayerweather and others against Charles C. Tucker,. Defendant moves to vacate the judgment and execution.

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence, J.

The plaintiffs allege in their complaint that between Febsuary 22, 1889, and November 16, 1889, they sold and delivered to the defendant at an agreed price certain quantities of sole leather, and they set forth in detail the date and agreed price of each of said sales, amounting in the aggregate to $8,739.86, upon which the sum of $800 has been paid, leaving a balance of $7,939.86 due and payable to the plaintiffs. It is also alleged in the complaint that the defendant, prior to the sale of certain shoes therein referred to, was and is insolvent, and various facts are stated in support of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sharp Paper & Specialty Co. v. FernándezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1942
  2. Spaulding v. American Wood Board Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Sharp Paper & Specialty Co. v. FernándezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API