Legal Opinion

Spaulding v. American Wood Board Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbusements.

1Per curiam

If there was power and discretion in the Special Term, then upon the merits we think it was properly exercised in denying the motion. It is insisted, however, that the defendant was entitled as of right to the order changing the place of trial. A fatal objection to this claim appears in the fact that it defaulted in serving its answer, and not having made the motion in time, as prescribed by the Code of Civil Procedure (§§ 982, 983, 984, 986), the defendant was not in a position to insist, as a matter of right, that the place of trial should be changed. (Vale v. Brooklyn Cross-Town R. R. Co.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fayerweather v. TuckerNew York Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Phillips v. TietjenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API