Flippo v. West Virginia
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
Petitioner’s motion to suppress evidence seized in a warrantless search of a “homicide crime scene” was denied on the ground that the police were entitled to make a thorough search of any crime scene and the objects found there. Because the rule applied directly conflicts with Mincey v. Arizona, 437 U. S. 385 (1978), we reverse.
One night in 1996, petitioner and his wife were vacationing at a cabin in a state park. After petitioner called 911 to report that they had been attacked, the police arrived to find petitioner waiting outside the cabin, with injuries to his head and legs. After…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Thompson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
3Cited by170 opinions
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. TibbettsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- United States v. Kory Ray SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- People v. WearIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
- R.D.S. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.