Legal Opinion
United States v. Kory Ray Smith
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 23, 2004No. 04-50046PublishedCited by 121 opinions
1Per curiam
Kory Ray Smith entered a conditional guilty plea to the charge of knowing possession of counterfeit currency, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 472. He reserved the right to appeal the district court’s denial of his pre-trial motion to suppress evidence. Smith now argues that the district court erred in (1) reversing its initial grant of his motion to suppress, (2) denying the motion to suppress, and (3) applying an incorrect standard of review to adjust his sentence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm the district court.
I. BACKGROUND
Kory Ray Smith was driving a…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. AcevedoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Thornton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- Been v. O.K. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Mark H. Ex Rel. Michelle H. v. LemahieuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. CaseresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Van AlstyneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Thomas Robins v. Spokeo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.