Legal Opinion

Tuttleman v. Beetem

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1911No. 1; Appeal, No. 285PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 285, Oct. T., 1910, by defendant, from order of C. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., June Term, 1910, No. 599, dismissing demurrer to statement in case of Harry Tuttleman et al., trading as Tuttleman Brothers & Faggen, v. Edward C. Beetem et al., trading as E. C. Beetem & Son. Demurrer to statement of claim. Before Davis, J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the facts. Error assigned was in dismissing the demurrer.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 285, Oct. T., 1910, by defendant, from order of C. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., June Term, 1910, No. 599, dismissing demurrer to statement in case of Harry Tuttleman et al., trading as Tuttleman Brothers & Faggen, v. Edward C. Beetem et al., trading as E. C. Beetem & Son. Demurrer to statement of claim. Before Davis, J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the facts. Error assigned was in dismissing the demurrer. The contract must be signed by the grantor or lessor whose authority is necessary to create an estate or interest thereunder and who would thereby part with an interest in…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hendebson, J.,

The plaintiffs declared on a written lease by which a term of one year from January 1, 1908, was granted to the defendants with the privilege on the part of the lessees to' remain in possession for a further period of two years at the annual rental of $1,000. The lease was signed by the lessees on December 14, 1907, but was not signed by the lessors. The lessees remained in possession for a year and held over for a second year at the end of which they removed from the premises. This action was brought to recover a part of the rent due for the third year for which the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dumn v. RothermelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  2. Tripp v. BishopSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  3. McClelland v. RushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  4. Lipper v. Bouvé, Crawford & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  5. Jennings v. McCombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Citizens Nat'l Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API