Legal Opinion
Hiram Ash v. Eugene Cvetkov
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 6, 1984No. 83-5972, 83-5983 and 83-6011PublishedCited by 686 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:
The district court dismissed this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
These consolidated cases arose out of a complex business arrangement, the nature of which is in dispute but is not the subject of this appeal. In 1978 Hiram and Joseph Ash (hereinafter collectively “Ash”) turned over to Eugene Cvetkov $30,000 worth of gold, to be used as raw material in Cvetkov’s jewelry manufacturing business. Lillian Callan similarly delivered $25,000 worth of gold. Western Management Corp. (“Western”) apparently leased real…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Patricia Scott Anderson v. Air West, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Albert Nealey v. Transportacion Maritima Mexicana, S. A. And Maersk LinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Wallace & Tiernan Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,198 Roy Huey v. Teledyne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by686 opinions
- David P. Pagtalunan v. George Galaza, Warden Thomas Maddock, Acting Director, California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Henderson v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Alphonso Thompson v. The Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, a Public CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Gregory Carey v. John E. KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Yourish v. California AmplifierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
681 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.