Legal Opinion
Havrilla v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 14, 2016No. 14-0204CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Keywords: Motion for Summary Judgment; Fair Labor Standards Act; 29 U.S.C. § 207(a); Meal Breaks; Predominant Benefit Analysis; De Minimis Interruptions
OPINION AND ORDER
KAPLAN, Judge.
Plaintiffs in this case are five employees of the United States Navy who work as “small arms repairers” at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hiekam in Honolulu, Hawaii (Pearl Harbor-Hickam or “the base”). They brought this action pursuant to section 207(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) claiming entitlement to backpay, liquidated damages, and other relief for overtime work they allegedly performed during them daily…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Akpeneye v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Akpeneye v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019