Legal Opinion
In re Grand Jury Investigation
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided March 24, 1992No. M-92-12PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SHARP, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the court on a motion for a protective order filed by the John Doe Company. The pleadings and the identity of the movant are under seal in accordance with the secrecy provisions of Rule 6, Fed.R.Crim.P., relating to grand jury proceedings.
In August 1991, the John Doe Company was served with three grand jury subpoenas duces tecum. The Company has produced over 22,000 pages of documents in response to the subpoenas. It now seeks a protective order protecting from discovery, and providing for the return of, 18 privileged…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Simon HorowitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- In re Grand Jury ProceedingsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- National Labor Relations Board v. E. Bruce HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- Lois Sportswear, U.S.A., Inc. v. Levi Strauss & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State ex rel. Allstate Insurance v. GaughanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- STATE EX REL. ALLSTATE INS. v. GaughanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Jeff Pavlik v. Cargill, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Hydraflow, Inc. v. Enidine Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1993
- Hopson v. Mayor of BaltimoreDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.