Conner v. Conner
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Pulasfci Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtFrazer, C. J.
The appellant sued the appellee for 'divorce, showing, by his complaint, three several acts of adultery by her, with as many men, within a period of one year. She answered by denial, and, by cross-petition, charged him with incest with their youngest daughter. The court found specially that each of the charges of adultery, made against the defendant, was true; that the charges made by the defendant, against the plaintiff, were not true; that the plaintiff’s estate, after paying his debts, *49was worth $1,300, which had been accumulated by the joint efforts of the parties; that the wife owned no…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rourke v. RourkeIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Chandler v. ChandlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by7 opinions
- Musselman v. MusselmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Phinney v. PhinneySupreme Court of Florida · 1919
- Hyatt v. HyattIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
- Spaulding v. SpauldingIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Fites v. FitesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.